SAT高分必读！一篇教你拿捏“学生笔记题”！-澜大教育官网

SAT高分必读！一篇教你拿捏“学生笔记题”！

发布时间：2025/04/03 15:30:02

浏览次数：

3.22号SAT补考学生的成绩昨天也已经陆续发放，其中澜大新橙的Daniel同学，取得了1590的超高分，非常棒。但由于昨天是4月1号愚人节，学生曾一度怀疑这个成绩会不会是个prank，经过再三核实，zui终确认自己真的实考1590。😄再次恭喜Daniel同学……至此，25年的第1场DSAT就暂告一段落了。

截屏2025-04-02 11.26.35.png 截屏2025-04-02 11.25.24.png
zui近，在复盘25年3月的这场考试时，发现语法部分的“学生笔记题”务必要引起重视了，觉得非常必要写篇文章提醒下学生们。

曾几何时，“学生笔记题”是那么的和善，那么的人畜无害，明显送分给学生，只要能看懂题目要求，不用回看notes就可以秒选正确选项。但其实，从24年的3月的真题中就已经开始有苗头，部分题目还是要回看笔记才能确保正确答案无疑，只是因为这样的题目数量不算太多，再加上也不是超难，以至于虽然老师课上反复强调zui后一步（务必回看笔记double-check所选答案），但很多学生还是没有引起足够重视。直到25年3月的这次考试，有些学生的阅读部分题多(高达17题)，且难题几乎没重复，会占掉大量答题时间，原本想靠后面简单些的语法弥补回来，结果发现语法的“送分题”也不简单，四个选项好像都有道理，长的也很“抽象”，跟阅读题似的，来不及做完，即使勉强答完了也非常不确定，悔不当初。今天我们就来讲一讲“学生笔记题”到底怎么做？

第1步：一定是先看题目要求，且看仔细/看懂具体有哪些要求。
第二步：还是看四个选项。但注意这3个要点：相关性>正确性>全面性。
详细来讲就是：
情况1: 只有1个选项与题目要求相关，不用回看notes，秒选即可。（节省时间，爽歪歪，嘿嘿！）
情况2: 不止1个选项与题目要求相关，务必要回看notes，先排除“与notes事实”不符的选项，
若只剩1个选项满足“相关性+正确性”，该选项即正确答案；（虽然需要花点时间，但也值了！）
若不止1个选项满足“相关性+正确性”，则考虑哪个选项给的信息“更全面”，即正确答案。（这种情况还是首次碰到，后续要引起重视，估计CB题库中这种题还有）

接下来，我们通过3道真题例题来说明：

例题1（选自DSAT2025-3月A卷）

while researching a topic, a student has taken the followwing notes:

• The United states has designated more than 500 areas National wildlife Refuges (NWRS).

• Some NwRs were established specifically to protect endangered species.

• The Crocodile lake NWR is a 6,686-acre area in Florida.

• It was established to protect the endangered American crocodile.

• The Pearl Harbor NWR is a 61-acre area in Hawaii.

• It was established to protect the endangered Hawaiian silt.

The student wants to emphasize a similarity between the two NWRs. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

(A) Both the Crocodile lake NWR and the Pearl Harbor NWR were established to protect endangered species.
(B) Some NWRs, such as Hawaii's Pearl Harbor, were established specifically to protect endangered species.
(C) While the Crocodile lake NWR extends across a 6,636 acre area, the Pearl Harbor NWR encompasses only 61 acres.
(D) The US has designated more than 500 areas NWRs, including the Crocodile Lake NWR in Florida.

正确答案：A

解析：题目要求选出“强调两个NWR间的一处相似点”的选项。通读四个选项，发现只有A项满足题目要求，秒选A。这时不回看notes完全没问题，即节省了答题时间还不会出错。
B项在讲some NWRs……，不满足题目要求的two NWRs，错误。
C项在讲两个NWR间的不同点，不满足题目要求的similarity, 错误。
D项在讲美国有超过500多个NWR，与题目两项要求更是无关，错误。

例题2（选自DSAT2025-3月D卷）

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes:

• Carbon can exist in several distinct structural forms called allotropes.

• Graphite is a carbon allotrope.

• Graphite is composed of stacked graphene sheets.

• Each graphene sheet is composed of carbon atoms arranged in a flat honeycomb pattern.

• Carbon nanotubes are carbon allotropes.

• They are composed of one or more graphene sheets wrapped into a cylindrical shape.

The student wants to emphasize a difference between carbon nanotubes and graphite. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

(A) Composed of sheets wrapped into a cylindrical shape, carbon nanotubes contrast with graphite, a carbon allotrope composed of graphene sheets.

(B) Graphite and carbon nanotubes are allotropes composed of stacked or wrapped graphene sheets, but carbon can exist in several distinct structural forms.

(C) Unlike carbon nanotubes, which are composed of sheets of carbon atoms arranged in a flat honeycomb pattern, graphite is a cylindrical carbon allotrope.

(D) The graphene sheets in graphite are stacked, whereas in carbon nanotubes, they form a cylinder.

正确答案：D

解析：题目要求选出“强调carbon nanotubes和graphite间的一处不同点”。通读四个选项，发现除了B项外，A/C/D三个选项好像都在讲两者的不同，这时就必须回看notes，核对哪些选项与notes中事实不符，zui终发现只有D项满足“相关且正确”，即答案。
A项需改为Composed of sheets wrapped into a cylindrical shape, carbon nanotubes contrast with graphite, a carbon allotrope composed of graphene sheets (wrapped into a flat honeycomb pattern). 才正确。
B项在讲carbon可以有很多不同的结构形式，与题目要求无关，错误。
C项虽在讲carbon nanotubes和graphite的不同，但与notes中事实讲反了，错误。

例题3（选自DSAT2025-3月B卷）

While researching a topic, a student has taken the following notes：

• Digital Light Synthesis (DLS) is a form of additive manufacturing that utilizes light to rapidly cure liquid resin into high-quality, 3D objects.

• Step 1: Ultraviolet (UV) light images are projected up into a pool of liquid resin, where the object's first layer takes shape.

• Step 2: The partially cured resin object is raised, leaving a thin space (a "dead zone") beneath it for oxygen and liquid resin to flow through.

• Step 3: The UV light passes through the dead zone—maintaining the flow of resin—and partially cures additional layers of the object.

• Step 4: When the resin object is complete, it is baked in an oven to complete the curing.

The student wants to describe how DLS cures 3D objects. Which choice most effectively uses relevant information from the notes to accomplish this goal?

(A) DLS cures 3D objects by passing through a "dead zone," adding layers to the object, then curing the object in an oven.

(B) In DES, UV light is projected into layers of liquid resin until the resin solidifies and passes through a "dead zone," wherein the curing is completed.

(C) In DLS, UV light images are projected into a liquid resin pool to cure a 3D object layer by layer; once solidified, the object is baked in an oven.

(D) DLS is a form of additive manufacturing that creates a "dead zone" in which UV light solidifies layer by layer before being baked in an oven, creating a high-quality, 3D object.

正确答案：C
解析：题目要求选出“描述DLS如何cures 3D物体”的选项。通读四个选项，发现好像所有选项都与题目要求有关，此时务必回看notes，经过反复仔细核对后，终于发现B/D项是有错误的，但感觉A/C项都没啥问题，于是开始纠结，甚至开始怀疑自己……

事实上，这题的重点在核对“正确性 + 全面性”上。

C项，描述的内容不仅相关正确，而且全面覆盖了notes中step1-4的信息，是答案。
A项，描述的内容相关正确，但缺少了step1，不如C好。
B项中“…… the resin solidifies and passes through a "dead zone,”……”信息错误，原文notes中step3里提到pass through dead zone的时候resin还是“main the flow of the resin”的状态，所以B项中讲resin 先solidify后pass through dead zones是不对的。
D项中“……that creates a "dead zone" in which UV light solidifies layer by layer……”信息错误，原文notes中step1里提到的the first layer不是在dead zone里形成的，是在dead zone形成前就已经有的。

那这题为啥要考虑“全面性”呢？

这也是很多学生的疑问之处，原因其实很简单，题目要求中原本就有“Which choice most effectively……”这条的，只是之前23/24年真题几乎未曾涉及过而已。

综上所述，学生笔记题曾经和善/人畜无害，但现在某些套题目中笔记题难度大，多个选项都能回应题干。那种各方面看起来都像“完美的梦中情答”的选项基本都不对，反而看起来比较抽象，有点相关含蓄的答案却可能才是正确答案。

分享到：

返回列表

热门头条

zui新阅读