zui新托福考情 | 独立题重复旧题，学术讨论写作出“新题”-澜大教育官网

首页 >新闻中心 >托福

zui新托福考情 | 独立题重复旧题，学术讨论写作出“新题”

发布时间：2025/04/08 16:52:17

浏览次数：

近期，托福考试的考情呈现出一些显著的趋势和变化，尤其是在写作部分。根据zui新的考情分析，独立写作部分的题目重复率较高，而学术讨论写作则出现了不少“新题”。这些变化对考生的备考策略提出了新的要求。

#01 独立口语思路解析

第1套

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It is impolite for tourists to take photos of local people without asking for permission?

是否同意：游客不经允许就给当地人拍照是不礼貌的。

*本题重复2019年8月24日

答法一：同意

理由一：未经允许拍照可能侵犯隐私，尤其是在私人场合；

表述关键词：Violation of privacy and autonomy. Taking photos of locals without consent disregards their right to control their own image. Many people value privacy, especially in vulnerable or non-public settings.

理由二：它会让人觉得不被尊重或不舒服；很多人对陌生人未经允许就给他们拍照感到不安或尴尬，即使这与文化信仰无关。

表述关键词：It can make people feel disrespected or uncomfortable. Many people feel upset or embarrassed when strangers take their photo without asking, even if it’s not about cultural beliefs.

答法二：拍照只是为了记录真实的文化

理由一：照片捕捉日常生活的真实时刻，为教育或艺术目的保留文化真实性。

表述关键词：Photos capture genuine moments of daily life, preserving cultural authenticity for educational or artistic purposes.

理由二：在许多社会中，在公共场合被拍照被认为是正常的；比如，游客用拍摄热闹的意大利广场，包括当地人聊天或用餐，不太可能引起冒犯。

表述关键词：

A tourist taking a wide-angle shot of a lively Italian piazza, including locals chatting or dining, is unlikely to cause offense.

pexels-photo-5088022.webp.jpg

#02 学术写作思路解析

Doctor Achebe:

Today, let's discuss about the effect of different transportation means. Short-distance air travel is increasingly criticized for its environmental impact. Air travel generates significantly higher carbon emissions per passenger than trains, up to10 times more on routes under 500 miles. Critics argue replacing such flights with rail could curb emissions. Should governments ban short flights? Explain why.

Claire:

I think short flights should be banned. Planes emit significantly more carbon per passenger than trains. Switching to trains for short trips, like Paris to Brussels or Tokyo to Osaka, would drastically reduce carbon footprints. Trains also often connect city centers directly, avoiding lengthy airport commutes. Giving priority to rail travel helps promote global sustainability.

Andrew:

Restricting short flights is impractical. People should choose transportation based on their needs. For urgent business trips, medical emergencies, or tight schedules, planes save critical time, which is a 2-hour flight versus a 6-hour train ride. Additionally, not all regions have reliable rail networks; imposing bans could isolate areas lacking alternatives. Instead of restricting options, governments should innovate cleaner fuels for planes.

思路：

赞同Claire，觉得应该禁止短途飞行，因为rail travel享有和air travel一样甚至更多的好处。

现代的高科技的rail transportation在升级后拥有同样快速/便捷/优质的乘坐体验-无需提前候机和复杂安检-rail station也不会像airport那样远离居住区-能够更节约时间/更有效率-这样rail travel享有和air travel一样甚至更多的好处。

分享到：

返回列表

热门头条

zui新阅读