10 月 16 日的托福考试已经结束,考生们的表现各不相同。此次考试究竟考了哪些内容?又有哪些题目成为了考生们的 “拦路虎”?接下来,我们将对 10 月 16 日的托福考试考情进行全面回顾,为大家一一解答这些疑问。
#01 独立口语思路解析
10月16日托福考试
Some students like to review their notes regularly on a daily basis, while others like to review their notes just before the test. Which do you prefer?
答法一:daily review
1、保证复习质量:举例面对较难的知识如“历史课上大量年份日期/经济”,课上很多概念理论术语,需要提前做好准备,每天巩固重复记忆,避免遗忘
2、减轻考前压力:对比考试前往往需要多门科目一起复习,心理负担重,容易考前焦虑,但如果能每天复习,复习压力减轻,更加自信稳定发挥
关键词:make sure reviewing quality, repetitively memorize, prepare in advance
Alleviate the pressure, mental burden, stabilize the performance
答法二:just before the test
1、每天更多空余时间:举例作为高中生,考前每天有很多任务:申请/文书/材料;不用每天复习可以让自己有时间劳逸结合,投入自己的爱好,减轻压力
2、更适合短期记忆的学生:举例自己比较擅长瞬时记忆,复习背诵特定历史年份时,速记记忆更准确;每天复习反而是机械性记忆
关键词:more time available, hectic lifestyle, balance study and life,Instant memory, specific timeline of historical events, rote memory
#02学术讨论写作思路解析
10月16日托福考试
Dr. Achebe
In recent years, the rise of artificial intelligence has introduced Al generators to draft essays and articles. While some people believe this is a valuable tool that can help writers save time and enhance their creativity, others argue that relying on Al undermines the development of writing skills and critical thinking. Do you think Al generators should be restricted? Please explain your reasoning.
Claire:I think Al generators should be restricted, mainly due to the high risk of plagiarism. Since Al doesn't always cite its sources, writers could unintentionally use ideas from others without proper attribution. For example, relying too much on Al could result in students facing academic penalties if their work is flagged for unoriginal content.
Andrew:I believe Al generators should continue to be used because they help writers focus on polishing their work rather than getting stuck on initial drafts. From my experience, Al can highlight mistakes or improve structure. it allows me to spend more time refining their ideas, ultimately producing higher-quality essays.
题目类型:对立题型
赞同立场:Claire 限制AI写作工具
论述逻辑:借助AI写作-- 写作内容来源于数据库或者已经存在的文章--内容不具备个人的经验和个人写作风格--缺乏独特性和个性化表达--不利于培养独立思维
using AI for writing - the content is sourced from databases or pre-existing articles - lack personal experience and individual writing style - short of uniqueness and personalized expression - not conducive to fostering independent thinking.
电话:400-963-5018
地址:上海黄浦区汉口路266号申大厦11楼
交通:地铁2、10号线南京东路站3号口
Copyright ©2023上海澜大教育信息咨询有限公司. All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备10035962号-1 沪公网安备31010102007782
Copyright ©2023上海澜大教育信息咨询有限公司. All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备10035962号-1 沪公网安备31010102007782